OPRD Volunteer Abuse

Oregon Parks & Recreation DepartmentDept.

Under Director Lisa Sumption.

Independently verifiable. Never legally challenged. Not going away.

Independently verifiable.Never legally challenged.Not going away.
  • Home
  • A Note About Ethics
  • Mapping the System
  • Key Individuals
  • Timeline
  • Resources
    • For Advocates
    • For Press
    • For Lawyers
    • For Legislators
  • Evidence
    • 1. The Origin Event
    • 2. The Escalation Response
    • 3. Trust Recruitment
    • 4. The Coercion Meeting
    • 5. Assessment & Surveillance
    • 6. Dismissal Without Process
    • 7. Expulsion & Retaliation
    • 8. Institutional Containment
    • 9. Police Intimidation
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • The Director's Decisions
    • The Open Letter
    • The Public Records Request
    • The Closure
  • The Governor's Silence
  • Selected Reading
Loading...

RESOURCES


← Police IntimidationFrequently Asked Questions →

I have reached out to every channel available to me. Every institution failed. Every mechanism of accountability was used to shield the people accountability was built to reach.

These pages are for the people who can help.

For Advocates
Share this with your network. This situation belongs in your awareness.
For Press
The story, the questions to ask, and who to ask them to.
For Lawyers
The case prepared in public. White v Watson. White v Oregon State Parks.
For Legislators
The structural gap in volunteer protections and how to close it.
← Police IntimidationFrequently Asked Questions →
THIS IS THE MAP.THIS IS THE PATTERN.THIS IS THE MIRROR.
© Robert Samuel White, 2025-2026.
This website is an independent public-interest documentation project.
It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the State of Oregon, Oregon Parks & Recreation Department (OPRD), or any other government entity.
All information presented reflects the creator’s firsthand experience, contemporaneous records, and evidence-based documentation.

Oregon State Flag
The State of Oregon can never again abuse a volunteer this way without documented precedent. When the Governor's office was directly notified and chose silence, this stopped being one agency's failure and became shared across the state structure.
Their institutional silence does not erase the pattern. It confirms it.
Governor Kotek, does a gay volunteer who documented retaliation and identity-based targeting by state employees deserve an independent investigation? Yes or no?

GitHubrswfire.comContact