OPRD Volunteer Abuse

Oregon Parks & Recreation Department

Under Director Lisa Sumption's Stewardship

Independently verifiable. Never legally challenged. Not going away.

Independently verifiable.Never legally challenged.Not going away.
  • Home
  • A Note About Ethics
  • The Displacement Framework
  • Accountability
    • Oregon State Police
  • Timeline
  • Key Individuals
  • Evidence
    • 1. Origin
    • 2. Escalation
    • 3. Trust
    • 4. Coercion
    • 5. Assessment
    • 6. Dismissal
    • 7. Retaliation
    • 8. Containment
    • 9. Intimidation
  • The Director's Decisions
    • The Open Letter
    • The Public Records Request
    • The Closure
  • The Governor's Silence
  • A Final Statement
  • Resources
    • For Advocates
    • For Lawyers
    • For Legislators
    • For Press
    • For Volunteers
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Selected Reading
Loading...
Permanent Record

Hosted free and open on GitHub directly. No server to seize. No host to pressure. No invoice to cancel.

It does not come down.
It does not go away.
It does not need me to stay up.

ACCOUNTABILITY

THE PUBLIC RECORD

← Police IntimidationThe Director's Decisions →
Oregon State Police — PR27478
Public Records Request PR27478 · CAD event SP26097765
My public records request for the March 24, 2026 police visit to my residence on restricted federal land, and Oregon State Police’s responses to it.
Status: Petition before the Oregon Attorney General under ORS 192.411.
View the record →
← Police IntimidationThe Director's Decisions →
THIS IS THE MAP.THIS IS THE PATTERN.THIS IS THE MIRROR.
© Robert Samuel White, 2025-2026.
This website is an independent public-interest documentation project.
It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the State of Oregon, Oregon Parks & Recreation Department (OPRD), or any other government entity.
All information presented reflects the creator’s firsthand experience, contemporaneous records, and evidence-based documentation.

Oregon State Flag
The State of Oregon can never again abuse a volunteer this way without documented precedent. When the Governor's office was directly notified and chose silence, this stopped being one agency's failure and became shared across the state structure.
Their institutional silence does not erase the pattern. It confirms it.
Governor Kotek, does a gay volunteer who documented retaliation and identity-based targeting by state employees deserve an independent investigation? Yes or no?

GitHubrswfire.comContact