I want to ensure there is no ambiguity here, so I want to clarify that I do not believe the second encounter was premeditated.

He was clearly surprised to see me there. He did not know he jogged a forest trail that was part of my route. He stopped coming immediately after because I was in uniform, in a forest service truck of my own, and he recognized what that meant.

The point is this - I collapsed [Park Supervisor]'s cover story simply by encountering him there.

He is local. He is not IT. He is not in a vehicle that explains his presence a year ago. He is precisely what I have said he was from day one.

A year ago you used that man to intimidate me while everyone was away at a regional event. I documented it. You still have not explained it.

Because you can't. Because it's precisely what it looks like - profound misuse of state resources to intimidate someone with no protection from you as free labor. That abuse is so extreme that you have been completely silent about it from the very beginning.

But now I know who he is.