THE RECORD SAYS YOU LIED
September 5, 2026, 12:11 PM
OREGON PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT · LETTER SENT
Oregon Parks & Recreation Department · To [Program Manager]
Her recorded March 25, 2025 promise of a review by Friday, set beside her agency's statement to the police that the permanent ineligibility attaches to March 25 -- the day of the call. If either document is honest, the other is not; the letter closes: if you can dispute a single word of this, do so now.
From
Robert Samuel White
To
[Program Manager]
Cc
Deputy Director JR Collier; Director Lisa Sumption; OPRD Commissioners; Governor Kotek
Date
September 5, 2026, 12:11 PM PT
Subject
[Program Manager], the record says you lied.
Document
01M1SFPP5GMVGVEX6CR6G74FK1
[Program Manager], On September 3, 2026, Oregon State Police produced its file on me under public records request PR27478. In it is the email your agency's Emergency Manager sent the police about me, and in that email is one date that belongs to you: "dismissed from volunteering with OPRD on 3/25/25 and flagged as ineligible for future service." March 25, 2025. The day you called me. On that call — recorded, published, transcribed — you said: "As far as next steps and what those look like moving forward — I'm going to review our conversation together. I'm going to review the details of the incident reports from Honeyman as well as Tugman. I'm then going to be meeting with the management for Tugman and making a determination about whether or not that service will be scheduled through with that park management. As well as then following that we'll make a determination on what does future service look like with Oregon State Parks." And you closed: "I'll be reaching out as soon as we're able to determine next steps. The absolute latest would be Friday the 28th." By your own agency's account to the police, my permanent ineligibility attaches to March 25 — the day of that call. The determination you told me you would spend the week making was already recorded on the day you described the process for making it. There was no review to conduct. There was no meeting that mattered. There was no Friday coming. You described deliberation to a man whose file already said forever. Your letter arrived March 26 and terminated my service "at this time." The flag your agency cites predates your own written notice by a day, and no notice of it was ever sent to me at all. I spent that call giving you complete transparency, and at minute 26 I built you a door — named my intent, acknowledged what I was learning, offered to adjust. You said thank you for sharing that, and you promised Friday. You have been silent ever since. The record now holds your promise and your agency's date side by side, permanently. If you can dispute a single word of this, do so now. Robert Samuel White