The same day, the institution responds that a search was conducted and identified no records responsive to the request.

CAD record SP26097765 released in full: officer initiated, no action taken, unit type Criminal, and the stated purpose.

Public statement issued on the release of CAD record SP26097765.

Petition asking the Attorney General to order Oregon State Police to complete PR27478. Twenty-five exhibits.

OSP Risk Management states a litigation hold is in place on SP26-097765, requiring reconfirmation every six months.

Five days after the petition, the institution states it has located additional records. The records had been in its systems since March and April, while it wrote that none existed.

The office decides the petition on an exemption claim Oregon State Police never made to him, and calls the remainder moot.

Request for any recording of the March 24, 2026 contact, including the travel and both vehicles.

Objection to two grounds in the order, both withdrawn the same morning. Notice of intent to file a new petition.

The April 13 fee letter, provided as the exemption assertion. It identifies no recording.

The exemption reference in the order comes from page 20 of the exhibits to his own petition.

Both objections of the same morning withdrawn. The fee letter does not state that a recording exists.

The fee letter's list has one checked item and no entry for body camera footage. No itemized list in four months.

Twenty-one items on the fee and exemption letter: the template, its versions, and the letters issued on it. Assigned PR36445.

The institution identifies the responsive records, withholds the body camera video, and conditions processing on $157.50.

The institution identifies the records and estimates $16,315.00, quoting 650 hours and release 130 weeks after payment.

Notice that the funds are secured and the cashier's check ships tomorrow, copied to the Director and the Governor.

The tracking number for the mailed fee. Notice that the next dispute goes to court, not to the Attorney General.

Confirmation that the case is not resolved, with the hold's scope set out: every record of the March 24, 2026 contact.

The Risk Analyst confirms preservation of the incident records, excepting item seven.

His date of birth entered the institution ten days before he provided it. Whatever carried it in is a record.

The Risk Analyst, on the item-seven context: she will forward it to the institution's CJIS team and inquire about a hold.

Sixteen files under both case numbers. Four documents the produced records reference as attached are not among them.

Ten categories the production itself identifies and does not include, each to be produced or its exemption stated.

Notice under ORS 30.275 to the State, OPRD and OSP, with claims named against five officials in their individual capacities.

To the captain who ordered the assessment asap. It closes on the badge beside every OSP signature: does yours say integrity also.

Every characterization quoted verbatim beside the evidence that refutes it.

Request for the records behind Dianne Greenlee’s March 11 email, where they are maintained, and who received them.

The withheld records are where the characterizations live. He asks for them beside what was produced.

To the captain of Government and Media Relations. Jamen Lee sent the link on March 3, and Kennedy forwarded it to Criminal Investigations the next morning.

The statute quoted in full to ten OSP addresses. Their file carries no crime and carries the characterizations instead.